Tuesday, August 16, 2022

Sansui Automatic Direct Drive Turntable FR-D35

 Sansui Auto Direct Drive Turntable FR-D35


It's thanks to having dragged this turntable and my declining collection of vinyl around for a few decades, unused, that I decided to put a vintage "audiophile" system together, as recounted here. Now that I've done so and have a working system, what is the reward for this long-suffering unutilized turntable? To be cast aside for something else immediately! 

The whole idea behind this stereo system build was to put together the best sounding system that I could, while spending the least amount of money. Or at least an ongoing battle between amount spent and quality achieved. It's very typical in many endeavours that you can get some pretty good bang for the buck without spending a lot of money. It's also typical to fairly quickly reach a point of diminishing returns, where the more money that you spend, the improvements become ever more miniscule. The trick then is to bump right up against that point--at least to your own personal tolerance level. For some, no improvement is too small. That's not me.



With this Sansui turntable, though, while it was good enough to spark my interest in doing this; it's just not good enough to be a regular part of this system. Let me explain: I now have a system that is capable of reproducing music with a great deal of resolution and clarity. The stylus here isn't capable of extracting high resolution and the cartridge not capable of turning everything sensed by the stylus into a good electrical signal, so it fails in terms of resolution: It's been fairly good in terms of extracting detail where it was pretty clear cut (rock music with a few instruments and  really clear mix). 



When I tried listening to some classical music where there was a lot going on, it quickly became clear that it was just overwhelmed. As an example, I tried listening to Beethoven's 9th Symphony. Right from the very first movement when the instruments all come in, and rise to a crescendo, it just becomes a smeary mass of sound, where it is not easy to distinguish the instruments. A comparison listen of the same Herbert von Karajan/Berlin Philharmonic recording  via Apple Music Lossless (via the Belkin Soundform Connect Airplay 2 receiver hooked up to the same system) demonstrated that the resolution of sound coming from this album should be much better. Given the relative pedigrees of everything in the signal chain, it's pretty logical to blame the turntable.

Ok, so much for resolution, what about fidelity? Well that's where the rest of the turntable joins the cartridge and stylus in being a bit of a letdown; and also indicates that replacing the cartridge would only go so far. There are a couple of objective performance indicators that can help you measure how well your turntable is at reproducing sound: Wow, Flutter and speed in RPMs (revolutions per minute). Wikipedia provides a good technical description of Wow and Flutter, but the tldr is that these are variations in the turntable speed. A regular album, as we know, is played at 33 1/3 RPM. If the turntable cannot consistently play at 33.3x speeds it will not reproduce the music at the correct pitch. 

If the turntable cannot hold whatever speed without too much variation this will show up in the Wow and Flutter numbers; and if high enough you will hear it as a "warbling" or wandering in the tone of the music. This will be most readily apparent when listening to music with long sustained notes, such as you will typically find more often in piano or classical music. There are apps available for IOS and Android that will let you measure these numbers using the accelerometers in your smartphone. 



This is... not good. We should be able to get a much more stable platform for a good stylus and cartridge to do their work.

What kinds of things have I already done, to ensure that I was getting the best possible sound out of that turntable? Good sound starts with clean albums. I got a cleaning kit--not one of those expensive album washers, just your basic kit with brushes and fluids--that I'll discuss in an upcoming post. I religiously clean my albums before playing; and regularly clean the stylus as well.

What about setup? I used the level built into my phone to get the turntable as flat as possible. I ensured that it was on a surface that would not overly pick up resonation from the speakers; and the speakers are on a hard basement floor with padded flooring between them and the concrete, so there will be minimum resonation feeding back into the turntable from the speaker. I replaced the rubber platter mat with an acrylic one that was supposed to bring more detail and less static. The static was indeed noticeable reduced, but I didn't hear any more detail, compared to the rubber mat. Lastly, I used a stylus weigh scale to set the weight to a conservative 1.4 grams: Heavy enough to stick to the grooves and track well, without being so heavy as to cause premature wear of the album. These measures were already all in place when I decided that much improvement would be needed; and that I would be better off to start with a new platform.

What are good mass-market audiophile turntables? The beauty of the vintage audio market is that there is so much choice out there. I wouldn't be looking at anything super-exotic; but rather looking for a turntable that will become the reference device in that area. In terms of technologies that I'm looking at, it will be the big 3, in order of what I currently consider to be their relative desirability for audiophile gear: Idler Wheel Drive, Belt Drive and Direct Drive. Some good vintage brands include Thorens, VPI, Dual, Rega, and many more.

It is also possible that I end up with a couple of different turntables. I will almost certainly end up with multiple cartridges with different characteristics. We'll see. I do have a candidate on the way that I should have my hands on by the end of the week. Hopefully it will be in good condition, as I will be getting it well used and not serviced; but the other nice thing about vintage gear is that they are well understood and parts availability is still generally good; so servicing should be readily available; or maybe I'll roll up my sleeves and tear it down myself as a learning opportunity. We will see. More to come.



Tuesday, August 2, 2022

Beats Fit Pro Impressions

 Beats Fit Pro -- My Impressions

Beats Fit Pro
Beats Fit Pro


It had to happen sometime, I suppose, but my beloved Powerbeats Pro are no more. What did I chose to replace them, and why? The what is pretty straightforward, given that the title is "Beats Fit Pro". Why did I select these? My user story includes a few particular use cases:
  • The new earbuds must work seamlessly with both IOS and Android. My work phone runs Android and my current personal cell is an iPhone 12 Pro Max. They must offer straightforward switching from one device to another.
  • They must be fully functional with one earpiece in, and useable as a handsfree for driving.
  • They must be secure and comfortable in my ears, and support invoking the appropriate Assistant through key phrase ("Ok Google", "Hey Siri" etc).
A little research on the web indicated that the Beats Fit Pro would meet my needs; however feedback in various Internet forums was mixed, in terms of comfort. Some found them comfortable right out of the box for all day wear; while others swore that they became very uncomfortable after an hour or so of wear. Right after I ordered the earbuds I went to my go-to solution for earbud comfort, Comply foam tips, and ordered some up.

Comply Foam Tips

Comply Foam Tips -- Amazon Listing






According to Comply, their replacement foam tips "when compared to silicone tips, are 30x softer,
provide a better grip than silicone for fewer listening distractions and block unwanted exterior noise so you can elevate your listening at lower volumes and help protect hearing." Is that true? Sort of. They are definitely much  more comfortable than the OEM silicone tips, and are more secure. Any additional sound isolation, though, is marginal in my experience. I found that I could tolerate them for about an hour with the silicone tips, and much longer--several hours--with the Comply tips. 

So why would I go out and get a fairly expensive set of earbuds and immediately start replacing stock gubbins? Comfort and usability. I do a similar thing any time that I get a device that has a stylus: I immediately hop onto the interwebs and start looking for replacement stylus tips that give the feel that I want. It means that the money that I spent to get the device in the first place is even better spent, by giving me a better experience. And I got absolutely nothing from @ComplyFoam for the plug.

I'll leave Beats with the last word here:

True, that


Beats Fit Pro


So how about the earbuds themselves, what are they like?


I've used them quite a bit since I got them mid-July (the replacement tips arrived a long 4 days later), with a variety of listening scenarios. Equipped with Apple's H1 chip, they perform similarly to, and have the same features as, the AirPods Pro, with the extra feature of actually staying put in my ears. Some reviewers found the "wings" that keep them in place to be uncomfortable. I blamed the wings as well until I got the replacement foam tips. I would say that the OEM silicone tips are the biggest source of discomfort. That turned out to be the case for me, anyway.

Speaking of the case, they come in a case that is much more compact than the one for the PowerBeats Pro. I have to say though that the case feels very cheap and chintzy by comparison, especially the flimsy lid. This does not give a favourable impression off the bat, although the case is a nice pocketable size.

Of course, any iDevice in the neighborhood will perk its ears up as soon as the case is opened, thanks to the H1. Pairing was as straightforward as you would expect. Also no issues pairing with an Android phone. There is also an app available on the Play Store that allows you to do all of the configuration, updates etc. from an Android device, so very agnostic from that perspective.

The listening modes here are as available for the AirPods Pro: ANC, which can be switched between ANC, Off and Transparency modes; and Spacialized modes of Off (Stereo) Fixed, or Head Tracked. In normal listening I tended to use Transparency, and Spacialize Off. In those modes I found the sound to be... pretty taut is the best adjective I can think of. Yes, they're Beats, so a bit bass-forward, but never "flabby", and were very good when used with music that had a lot going on: Many instruments, intricate notework. Just right on top of the sound and never felt like they were overwhelmed, with good detail. Should you take my assessment as gospel? No! I'm not an audiophile with trained ears, and my observations are just that, my observations. Your mileage will vary.

I have to admit being hugely disappointed by the ANC. It did not cancel anything. It barely even attenuated anything. Maybe I've been spoiled by my B&W PXes and others; but I was really not impressed. They would not be my recommendation for a long flight. Spatialized audio I found to be mostly a gimmick as well. I found it useful and handy when viewing video content, but just a bit gimmicky when listening to music. I haven't found anything yet that made me say "Oh now I get it"! 

So what's the tldr? Decent earbuds, reasonable price, good performance.